*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

[TheSpoonald]

Can't find any confirmation of what you wrote after this. The best I can find is the warden had a hard-on for this guy, not much more.

So you're saying you did confirm the story. Great.

Also, Trump claimed he was intervening owing to the guy's 'past service'. So, if the guy wasn't a 'hero' then Trump would be ok with his civil rights being abused?

Stop. Throwing some platitudes to soldiers doesn't mean that the Trump did anyone any favors for any special reason.

But regardless of Trump's reasoning....he's negated some potential credible grounds for this guy to appeal a conviction. That cannot be denied. I'm now asking you or Oskar to explain why that's bad?

[Poopadoop]

reductio ad bananum

No, I'm saying the details of your story are difficult to corroborate. Just because the warden didn't like him doesn't mean he abused his rights.

regardless of Trump's reasoning....he's negated some potential credible grounds for this guy to appeal a conviction. That cannot be denied. I'm now asking you or Oskar to explain why that's bad?

So if you do the right thing for the wrong reasons you're moral?