*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

[Poopadoop]

https://www.foxnews.com/us/navy-seal...lawyers-allege

1. That doesn't answer my question. You're simply drawing an inference as to why Trump intervened.

2. I asked for an independent, UNBIASED source. Try again.

[TheSpoonald]

2. I asked for an independent, UNBIASED source. Try again.

OMG fuck off.

[Poopadoop]

OMG fuck off.

Isn't your standard of belief to see overlap between two equally biased sources on both sides of the political spectrum? By that standard, you've failed your own test.

[TheSpoonald]

Isn't your standard of belief to see overlap between two equally biased sources on both sides of the political spectrum? By that standard, you've failed your own test.

I trust Fox, and almost any other news source, to accurately quote the Seal's lawyers.

If all you got is "nyahhh Fox News!" go eat a pine cone.

[Poopadoop]

I trust Fox, and almost any other news source, to accurately quote the Seal's lawyers.

If all you got is "nyahhh Fox News!" go eat a pine cone.

So, in your mind:

Fox says it and somebody on the left corroborates it = TRUE
Fox says it and nobody on the left corroborates it = TRUE
CNN says it and somebody on the right corroborates it = TRUE
CNN says it and nobody on the right corroborates it = FALSE

To sum up then, you believe everything Fox says, and only believe what CNN says if Fox also says it.

Yeah, that seems reasonable lol.

[TheSpoonald]

So, in your mind:

Fox says it and somebody on the left corroborates it = TRUE
Fox says it and nobody on the left corroborates it = TRUE
CNN says it and somebody on the right corroborates it = TRUE
CNN says it and nobody on the right corroborates it = FALSE

To sum up then, you believe everything Fox says, and only believe what CNN says if Fox also says it.

Yeah, that seems reasonable lol.

Do you believe Fox misquoted the lawyers? Do you think they read a legal pleading, and then completely misrepresented it in print? Is that what you're saying.

Seriously just fuck off. We were having a conversation about an interesting topic, and as usual you de-rail it when you run out of logic. Instead of continuing the conversation you just say "Nyah your sources suck, so everything you say is probably wrong"

Honestly dude, it's pathetic. I don't know if you're doing this on purpose (lame) or not (hopelessly dumb)

[Poopadoop]

Instead of continuing the conversation you just say "Nyah your sources suck, so everything you say is probably wrong"

If your assumptions are based on uncorrobated facts, then yes the rest of your argument is weakened. There's nothing illogical about pointing that out, whether you like it or not.