Well done for ignoring the fact that the UK invading Wales and Scotland is distant history. So distant in fact the only non-King to have invaded Scotland was Cromwell in 1650. They've had nearly 400 years to leave if they want.And we are not members of the EU against our will either. They are not forcing us to stay.
We haven't left yet. So the first vote is ignored, the second vote matters? Is that democracy? If we leave, and then in 20 years we want back in, fair enough. 2016's democratic will has not been actioned yet. That simply has to happen.Our will may have changed since 2016.
Are you aware than England has actually been successfully invaded? I don't hate the French because of the Norman invasion. I don't hate the Italians for the Romans. So no, you're being ridiculous.Perfect. So you admit you're ok with being the conqueror but not the vanquished.
I assume you voted. So you had your say.Apparently it is my place to have a say in what the country I live in does.
Scottish independence is fuck all to do with me. Why should I have a say on the matter?But they didn't for the Scottish referendum. So maybe you should take that up with your MP if it makes you angry.
With Scotland included the vote was 51.89% Leave. Excluding Scotland it would have been 53.10%. So yeah, it would go up < 1.5% without Scotland. Wow.
Like I say, only a complete moron would think that Scotland leaving the UK would still leave a debate on the matter in the rest of the UK.
It doesn't matter. If they voted to leave, that's what they voted for. Whether they voted because they want us to leave, or because they thought they were signing up for free beer, is completely irrelevant. What they actually voted for was to leave the EU.Has it occurred to you that some people voted for reasons that weren't all about if/how/when Brexit happens? I appreciate that makes your little analysis a bit more complicated.





Reply With Quote