I'd be cool with healthcare-for-all by making much of what people want to buy/sell legal again, rather than by monopolizing it even further.
|
03-15-2020 01:17 PM
#1
| |
![]()
|
I'd be cool with healthcare-for-all by making much of what people want to buy/sell legal again, rather than by monopolizing it even further. |
|
03-15-2020 01:38 PM
#2
| |
A person's health is not something that makes sense to view as a good in a supply and demand chain. If you need a drug or treatment to live, the demand is there no matter the price. As a result you see americans getting charged 10x as much for insulin, because the free market is at work and that's what people are willing to pay before it's either cheaper to fly to Mexico or Canada to buy insulin. If they can't afford that, they ration insulin and die. Under a government regulated single payer system this doesn't happen. | |
| |
|
03-15-2020 01:43 PM
#3
| |
![]()
| |
|
03-15-2020 01:52 PM
#4
| |
Look, fat, you wanna do an IQ test? Let's do pushups together? C'mon man! | |
Last edited by oskar; 03-15-2020 at 01:55 PM.
| |
|
03-15-2020 01:55 PM
#5
| |
![]()
| |
|
03-15-2020 03:38 PM
#6
| |
|
03-15-2020 01:47 PM
#7
| |
M4A has to be a single payer system. You can't have a private company involved at any point. As long as you have insurance companies involved for whatever reason, they will lobby against it to carve out their own space to keep operating. That's why all the fake progressives ran on "M4A for all who want it" or "M4A but not for millionaires" because that is just a dogwhistle for insurance companies to mean: 'it won't be M4A" - it would be Obamacare 2.0. | |
| |