|
 Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey
It's like the entire idea of uniting states is anathema to you, ong.
I'm not putting up the USA as a paragon of anything, but these united states are not living with any feeling of missing democracy or freedom. Whether or not that's appropriate in the US is a great topic for debate, but that's not what we're doing, here. Each state contributes to the "superstate's" military, but also maintains state-level military services. The people of the USA largely feel a sense of sovereignty and freedom, despite what you would probably describe as the opposite, due to their membership in the USA.
If your arguments are putting forth that this kind of superstate is bad for the UK for some reasons specific to the UK, then cool. However, if your arguments are that this style of cooperative / membership governance in a greater political union is an obvious moral wrongness, then your arguments simply aren't making that point.
Even then, states' rights have been relatively strong in the US, but they're even stronger in the EU. Each country has the right to entirely determine its own foreign policy, to generally manage its own economy how it sees fit - apart from having a dedicated team that negotiates trade deals as part of a bloc - and has frictionless trade and immigration between members. But yeah, who wants that when we can have "sovereignty" and "democracy"?
|