Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFTR Community

*** OFFICIAL BREXIT SUNLIT UPLANDS and #MEGA THREAD ***

Results 1 to 75 of 3522

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    MadMojoMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10,456
    Location
    St Louis, MO
    It's like the entire idea of uniting states is anathema to you, ong.

    I'm not putting up the USA as a paragon of anything, but these united states are not living with any feeling of missing democracy or freedom. Whether or not that's appropriate in the US is a great topic for debate, but that's not what we're doing, here. Each state contributes to the "superstate's" military, but also maintains state-level military services. The people of the USA largely feel a sense of sovereignty and freedom, despite what you would probably describe as the opposite, due to their membership in the USA.

    If your arguments are putting forth that this kind of superstate is bad for the UK for some reasons specific to the UK, then cool. However, if your arguments are that this style of cooperative / membership governance in a greater political union is an obvious moral wrongness, then your arguments simply aren't making that point.
    Normalize Inter-Community Sense-Making
  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey View Post
    It's like the entire idea of uniting states is anathema to you, ong.

    I'm not putting up the USA as a paragon of anything, but these united states are not living with any feeling of missing democracy or freedom. Whether or not that's appropriate in the US is a great topic for debate, but that's not what we're doing, here. Each state contributes to the "superstate's" military, but also maintains state-level military services. The people of the USA largely feel a sense of sovereignty and freedom, despite what you would probably describe as the opposite, due to their membership in the USA.

    If your arguments are putting forth that this kind of superstate is bad for the UK for some reasons specific to the UK, then cool. However, if your arguments are that this style of cooperative / membership governance in a greater political union is an obvious moral wrongness, then your arguments simply aren't making that point.

    Even then, states' rights have been relatively strong in the US, but they're even stronger in the EU. Each country has the right to entirely determine its own foreign policy, to generally manage its own economy how it sees fit - apart from having a dedicated team that negotiates trade deals as part of a bloc - and has frictionless trade and immigration between members. But yeah, who wants that when we can have "sovereignty" and "democracy"?
    I just think we should suspend judgment on Boris until we have all the facts through an inquiry, police investigation, and parliamentary commission...then we should explode him.
    also,
    I'd like to be called Lord Poopy His Most Gloriously Excellent.
  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by mojo
    It's like the entire idea of uniting states is anathema to you, ong.
    Well observed.

    I'm not putting up the USA as a paragon of anything, but these united states are not living with any feeling of missing democracy or freedom.
    American democracy is heavily flawed, as we saw when Trump won an election with less votes than Clinton. And you of all people know that "freedom" in USA is bullshit, USA have more people in prison per capita than everyone except China and possibly some small shithole countries.

    If it works for USA, all power to you guys. But I do not want to see Europe "uniting" into one superstate, or at least I don't want the UK to be a part of it.

    There's a big difference between the USA and Europe... culture. I appreciate USA is a mix of various cultures, but the people primarily speak one language. Texas has more in common with Montana than the UK does with Italy. Europe is a continent containing lots and lots of different cultures and languages.

    It's hard enough balancing internal interests within the UK, which is itself a union of multiple cultures. But at least we all speak the same language here and have much in common. But even the UK is struggling and possibly won't exist in its current form for much longer.

    If your arguments are putting forth that this kind of superstate is bad for the UK for some reasons specific to the UK, then cool.
    It's bad for the UK because we are a sovereign state and have been for a very long time. Texas isn't a sovereign state, nor has it ever been. The USA was formed as a union when they declared independence from the UK. The UK is used to ruling itself. Texas is not.

    It's not that I have a problem with the American system, it's that I don't think that can work in Europe because Europe has suffered many wars, some very recent, Europe is a continent of cultures that don't historically get on very well. Enforced unions won't resolve those problems. Mutual respect for each others' sovereignty is a better plan imo.
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    ongies gonna ong

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •