|
|
 Originally Posted by BankItDrew
How do you suppose a judge would view this incident if instead of pulling out his gun, the shooter pulled out his other keys for his other car, and ran the thief off the road to his death?
I get the impression that Americuh would frown upon the second scenerio more so than the original.
Well, duh. How could one even remotely consider the second scenario to be personal defense or even defense of property? It obviously entails significant risk of personal injury and ensured destruction of property.
Most 'Muricans, myself included, wouldn't support the shooter's actions in the original scenario.
|
Reply With Quote