|
|
 Originally Posted by NightGizmo
I just read through his posts and there are only 2 that have any real content. The rest are fluff, smileys, asking about vote counts/rescinds, and mimicing other players.
I've been having fun and paying attention, so some fluff, not much. That hardly seems like a good enough reason to call me out.
Mimicking others? Is that because I agreed with some content, and came to some similar conclusions about strategy? OK, fine, I didn't feel the need to restate something I agree with. Fair point.
 Originally Posted by NightGizmo
#222 - He says that JKDS and jyms "feel funny", and then Ong calls him out for not having the experience playing with them to have any basis for making that comment.
#323 - While it's still close between eugmac and daven, he switches to eugmac. This is probably his best post, because he started to explain his thought process, although he didn't provide any concrete evidence or specifics.
Perhaps Ong is right. I didn't mean it as a personal read, but as a strategy read. I'm still on the fence about JKDS, and have explained why.
It hardly seems fair to expect anyone to throw out a concrete accusation on Day 1. Surely, any evidence is circumstantial at best, and based on actions which have the most premeditation.
 Originally Posted by NightGizmo
He's clearly watching the thread, because he keeps popping in with fluff -- in fact, he's paying very close attention, because he has made a couple posts asking about bad vote counts or missed rescinds. So why isn't he posting more real content/analysis?
I'm throwing out my reads as I get them, but trying to avoid throwing a bunch of distracting first impressions, which I haven't given myself time to think through.
 Originally Posted by NightGizmo
His vote for eugmac also came at a time that helped daven, because they were the two main wagons. If MMM flips wolf, we'd have to take a closer look at daven.
My vote switced when it became apparent that my vote for Gabe was being wasted. It was too late in the day to pressure anyone new (and unlikely that anyone is following a late-day wagon by a noob).
On the whole, I'd say there are worse offenders for everything I've been cited with, and feel that this vote is just a distraction.
Did I give you what you were hoping for, NightGizmo?
|