Quote Originally Posted by banana
Or maybe you already had a rock solid alibi. You were in the US running the most expensive presidential campaign in history.
I hope he's not using that as an alibi for an event that happened a decade ago or whatever.

If a girl went missing somewhere where I was recently on holiday, and the police issued an efit that vaguely resembled me, and I became aware of this through media, then yes, of course I would get in touch, because maybe they have some important questions to ask me. Maybe I can help them. It's not just about eliminating oneself from their enquiries. I'd be concerned about the welfare of the missing girl.

That fact was mentioned only because the source that made the claim is the ONLY source linking podesta to portugal.
I really don't think that's the only source. From what I can tell from a quick bit of googling, Suffolk Police (UK) were looking into whether Sir Clement Freud (yep, Sigmund's peedo grandson) had any involvement, since he owned a property nearby, and was a peedo. They concluded Clement was not in Portugal at the time, but had loaned the use of his property to the Podesta's.

If ALL Christians were basing their faith in god on the claims of that one man, and that one man proves to be fantastically un-credible. Then yes, they should ALL reasses their theological position.
But noone I'm aware of is basing their faith in that one man that thinks the queen is a lizard. There might be a lot of people giving it credit because it was part of a wikileaks dump, but that's a different story. I don't see wikileaks saying anything about lizard queens.

So I've always wondered who buys those rags at the grocery checkout running headlines about subterranean mole people blackmailing the mayor of new york so they can get HBO in their sewer hideout. Now I know.
lol I'm not stupid enough to pay for that sort of shit, that's what the internet is for. That's rather like assuming that because I like Japanese lesbian porn, I'm buying wank mags from motorway service stations.

I'm really not familiar with the Savile case, but if you want an example of real systematic pedophilia, just look at the Catholic diocese in Boston MA. That shit REALLY happened. But that doesn't mean that I now believe that every accused predator who is found to be innocent is being "protected".
Look into the Savile case if you want to know what I mean by "protected". I don't assume every accused predator is protected. I assume those at the top who compromise themselves will be protected, people like Sir Jimmy Savile and Sir Clement Freud. Note both were sirs. Note both are dead. Note neither went to prison for their crimes. "proetection" is as real as the Vatican nastiness.