**** Elections thread *****

[wufwugy]

Well if your source is something credible, that would support your arguments. If your source is something you read on r/thedonald, then yeah you're probably right.

Unless you provide evidence to back up your claims when asked, they're nothing but empty arguments.




That's not how arguments work.

Descartes: Cogito ergo sum.

Pepe Lepeux : Why do you say that?

Descartes: Look it up.

...doesn't happen.

Assuming the human element is neutral. When in debate, it is not neutral.

[Poopadoop]

Assuming the human element is neutral. When in debate, it is not neutral.

Doesn't change the fact that if you present arguments with no evidence, they're shitarguments.

[wufwugy]

Doesn't change the fact that if you present arguments with no evidence, they're shitarguments.

For your benefit.

Also, don't think too highly of the goings on here. I think that your argument depends on you already agreeing with what you want me to substantiate in the first place, as I presented above.