|
|
 Originally Posted by wufwugy
Video from 2009.
 Originally Posted by wufwugy
Wikipedia? Ok ok. You do know that anyone can edit that source, right?
 Originally Posted by wufwugy
Did you see the thing the soon to retire Swedish policeman posted on FB a couple weeks ago? It got real big. He said he's tired of every call he takes being some violent crime with prime suspect Muhammad. Word is that he's being investigated for hate speech or something.
Haven’t heard of it. Anecdotal it seems. Plus, a quick google search of that yielded my favorite “news” sources as top hits.
Express.co.uk, Infowars, Breitbart, Virginia Dare, theMuslimIssue.wordpress.com.
Hmmm …
 Originally Posted by wufwugy
This one seems real. I wonder though, where is the actual 60 minutes video on the whole thing? Why was this posted on a youtube channel with 100 subs and not the official 60 minute one? Seems like a huge story, one which an outlet 60 minutes would sure as shit post everywhere in all four winds … odd.
 Originally Posted by wufwugy
Hmmm. How credible is the daily mail?
https://www.quora.com/How-credible-is-the-Daily-Mail
In my opinion, the Daily Mail has zero credibility.
Personally, I use it as a reverse fact check – if the Daily Mail says something is true then I assume it is untrue.
Look around long enough on the internet and you will find that one obscure link that will validate your point.
http://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/a/g26Lk
http://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/a/...t-mr-president
http://www.vox.com/world/2017/2/19/1...st-attack-fake
|