|
 Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey

You think your avatar has a role in you ability to persuade this group of science-minded people.
I haven't read up on persuasion methods, but it seems like "know your audience, and cater to their sensibilities" has to be right up there at the top of the list.
***
In fairness, the rest of this is probably not bad.
The problem is that, on FTR, people aren't persuaded by you because your notion of what counts as evidence is not the same as ours.
I think we'd all be more persuaded if you were more openly critical of your positions. When you take an objective, inquisitive approach, you change the tone of "listen to me, I'm right" to "help me figure out how to be right." Ultimately, if you can pull this off in a disingenuous way which manipulates your position, you could maybe be more persuasive. Problem is that you're going to get actual data from your partners in the conversation and if you keep countering with your feelings, then I think you're not going to persuade this crowd any more than you have been.
Listen to me, I'm right: you're right, being perceived as more objective is more persuasive.
|