*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

[MadMojoMonkey]

No, it's the "we devolve into political droolers by ignoring the intelligent discourse which opposes ours, and only focusing on the vocal idiots who are easy targets, unwittingly making ourselves easy targets."
AKA the "wuf marginalizes his political voice" thread.

[Poopadoop]

No, it's the "we devolve into political droolers by ignoring the intelligent discourse which opposes ours, and only focusing on the vocal idiots who are easy targets, unwittingly making ourselves easy targets."
AKA the "wuf marginalizes his political voice" thread.

The only thing I would object to here is the use of the present tense. He's been doing this for over a year now.

Can't wait for Wufmindlessshitposting thread 3 with some other catchy title that I can safely put on my ignore list.

[Savy]

The only thing I would object to here is the use of the present tense. He's been doing this for over a year now.

Can't wait for Wufmindlessshitposting thread 3 with some other catchy title that I can safely put on my ignore list.

You don't enjoy reading them?

At least three of his posts in this thread are legitimately funny.

[Poopadoop]

You don't enjoy reading them?

At least three of his posts in this thread are legitimately funny.

I enjoy it as much as I can enjoy vacuousness sure.

[Savy]

I enjoy it as much as I can enjoy vacuousness sure.

1, 3 & 15 are good.

With regards to the google post and treating people as individuals I think the poster of that comment forgets two things which are pretty important. The first of which is that if you are in an industry that is say 90% male you are missing out on a load of great women who would be a massive plus to the industry and thinking of ways to encourage those women into the company is a huge plus. I'd argue companies attempting to do this do so really badly but in principle it's definitely something they should be looking to do because it's a huge plus for the company. The second thing he forgets is that the concept of treating people as individuals is actually a much falser reality than what's going on, racism, sexism etc all exist and play a big part in peoples everyday judgements so to say judge people as individuals and juts assume that no bias exists is just shitty rhetoric too.

I don't think people appreciate the fact that women leaving the workforce is actually a huge drain on the workforce. To put it more in numbers if 98% of the top 30% of the male workforce are working to near their potential in the workplace and only 60% of that top 30% of females is doing the same you're putting worse people in jobs. Even if you expect that number to be lower for women due to gender differences it's not hard to see that we're talking gulfs in difference when it should be small differences.

[wufwugy]

1, 3 & 15 are good.

With regards to the google post and treating people as individuals I think the poster of that comment forgets two things which are pretty important. The first of which is that if you are in an industry that is say 90% male you are missing out on a load of great women who would be a massive plus to the industry and thinking of ways to encourage those women into the company is a huge plus. I'd argue companies attempting to do this do so really badly but in principle it's definitely something they should be looking to do because it's a huge plus for the company. The second thing he forgets is that the concept of treating people as individuals is actually a much falser reality than what's going on, racism, sexism etc all exist and play a big part in peoples everyday judgements so to say judge people as individuals and juts assume that no bias exists is just shitty rhetoric too.

I agree.

I don't think people appreciate the fact that women leaving the workforce is actually a huge drain on the workforce. To put it more in numbers if 98% of the top 30% of the male workforce are working to near their potential in the workplace and only 60% of that top 30% of females is doing the same you're putting worse people in jobs. Even if you expect that number to be lower for women due to gender differences it's not hard to see that we're talking gulfs in difference when it should be small differences.

I'd state it as "drain on business" instead of on workforce. People leaving the workforce is a benefit for those who remain yet it is bad for employers.

[Savy]

I'd state it as "drain on business" instead of on workforce. People leaving the workforce is a benefit for those who remain.

You don't you're just lying to make me more agreeable but yes I agree I used inconsistent terminology.

[wufwugy]

I agree.



I'd state it as "drain on business" instead of on workforce. People leaving the workforce is a benefit for those who remain yet it is bad for employers.

I should clarify that this doesn't mean that labor participation exit is actually good for the remaining laborers. In most ways it is probably bad. Lucky for us, entry and exit of labor tends to be an effect from a change in something else. My initial claim was regarding the exit resulting in (and from) virtually no industry disruption other than employers having a harder time finding employees and having to pay them more.