idk what this has to do with sociopathy. These might or might not be the actions of a sociopath. What we can both certainly agree on is that they are not the actions of someone fit for public office. (c) seems subjective and alone wouldn't be grounds for a suspension, but the others, assuming the Committee has the same standards of proof as a court, most certainly are. 90 days seems like a ridiculously lenient punishment. That's a nice long holiday, it's pretty much a reward.Originally Posted by Poopadoop
Seems the Parliamentary Standards Committee aren't seeing the upside of sociopaths, at least not when they're also the PM.
Reply With Quote