|
|
 Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
Well, now the force of your facts fails you. The second amendment was a check on the United State government in its design and I still believe it to be today. You can disagree, but I'm willing to bet it would be useful in the right scenarios (but again this is predicting the future, which I am incredibly bad at). And it doesn't matter who says it just as it doesn't matter who says evolution is real.
That's the theory. Which has been shown to be much more likely wrong than right.
But I'll still give you the win for this exchange, as I also feel that even though I stand in a lesser intellectual position, I wield the force of dumber men - that is the weakness of democracy. The second amendment won't budge any time soon.
What weakness of democracy, and how is it that the democratic process required to put the 2nd remedies into action doesn't apply to this weakness?
People can scream until they're blue in the face about how their guns are protecting them from the state or the corporations, but until there's evidence to actually back that up.... The evidence has been gathered for a very long time, and it doesn't support their position
|