|
 Originally Posted by OccupyingSpace
Throwing a cat, or any creature including a human in a fire and torturing it is sick and demented at best. There are many rednecks and people who drink, but they do not torture animals and justify that it's in character.
I totally agree. If you read what I wrote, you'll see that I said it was understandable. As in, I can understand those circumstances and the outcome seems plausible, given certain assumptions about rednecks and cats.
 Originally Posted by OccupyingSpace
A large percentage of murders have been found to have also tortured animals.
These are equally true:
A large percentage of murderers have been found to have not tortured animals.
A large percentage of non-murderers have been found to have tortured animals.
A large percentage of non-murderers have been found to have not tortured animals.
Without specifics, each of these statements is a hollow assemblage of words which conveys identical meaning to 3 other statements. All 4 bear noticably different emotional content and persuasive intent.
 Originally Posted by OccupyingSpace
You have never met a cat that is asking you to douse it in gasoline and oil, and then not only throw it in a fire, but hold it there which is what Avery did.
A large percentage of what I said about cats and what they ask for was utter nonsense intended to induce smiles in humans.
A large percentage of cats report you were over-thinking it.
 Originally Posted by OccupyingSpace
An innocent animal does not want to be tortured and burned alive. What a sick statement.

[ ] tortured a cat today
[X] saved the world
Damn it feels good to be a gangsta
|