Your repeated arguments to play on a short stack are, indeed, indicative of you having a fishy leak in your game.

We've explained multiple times why sitting on a short stack doesn't limit your losses, it limits your wins. Still you persist to say fishy stuff like, "I don't have alot of money to keep topping up right now and I want to get used to playing with different sizes."

If you can't afford to lose 30 buy-ins, then you can't afford to play. Even a winning player can hit some brutal downswings.
If you're choosing to play when you can't afford it, then fine, but you really shouldn't then get uppety when someone says you're not playing like a person trying to be a pro.
Of course you're not, that's not your goal. You're just having a bit of fun and burning a bit of your disposable income on a hobby. That's legit.

However, if your goal is to play like a pro and to move up in stakes out of the micros, then we're giving you advice with a full explanation of the reasons behind the advice, and you're coming back at us with, "This guy who wrote a book says no." OK. What were his reasons? Let's talk about whether those apply and if they do, let's talk about whether I am wrong. I don't like to be wrong. I don't want to give bad advice. If you're looking for someone to just tell you what to do without reasons, then 2+2 is a better poker forum for that, IMO.