Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
I am analyzing the data objectively, you are explaining them subjectively. In other words, I am saying what happened, and you are trying to explain why it happened.
WRONG

You started this whole conversation by asserting that the 26% swing was ascribable, specifically, to distaste for Trump.

You started with a "why". Now that its debunked, you've retreated to a very narrow island of "what"

Lame