*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

[TheSpoonald]

So basically all you want from the president to make democrats angry.

That's a hugely glib interpretation of my position.

As for the rest of your post, I'm not sure what you're talking about. I never once advocated for open borders, and it's certainly not something I support.

[oskar]

That's a hugely glib interpretation of my position.

As for the rest of your post, I'm not sure what you're talking about. I never once advocated for open borders, and it's certainly not something I support.

What is taking immigrants into the country with no legal process to you? How is it different from open borders?

[TheSpoonald]

What is taking immigrants into the country with no legal process to you? How is it different from open borders?

I'm honestly not sure where the bolded part is coming from

An immigrant detained at teh border has to be held somewhere. We are currently running out of space. Current immigration policy has them identified, given a hearing date (that they skip), and allowed to roam free in America until they are apprehended again. That's the current legal process.

Instead of letting them go, or keeping them in a detention facility, Trump is proposing to offer them a bus ride to Oakland. What's your beef with that?

[Poopadoop]

Instead of letting them go, or keeping them in a detention facility, Trump is proposing to offer them a bus ride to Oakland. What's your beef with that?

I guess one objection might be that it's a childish and irresponsible way of dealing with his the shortcomings of his own immigration policy.

[TheSpoonald]

I guess one objection might be that it's a childish and irresponsible way of dealing with his the shortcomings of his own immigration policy.

So? What else ya got?

Pelosi called the policy "cruel". Who is the victim in that story?

[Poopadoop]

So? What else ya got?

Pelosi called the policy "cruel". Who is the victim in that story?

I think it's irrelevant what Pelosi says, especially if you condense it into one word. We're talking about why it's a victory troll for Trump or why a victory troll ranks up there with the New Deal and the Civil Rights Act as a presidential achievement.

[TheSpoonald]

I think it's irrelevant what Pelosi says

"Shut up!" he explained

We're talking about why it's a victory troll for Trump

Did you watch the Tucker Carlson video I posted earlier? If not, do so, and you'll have an answer to this question.

a victory troll ranks up there with the New Deal and the Civil Rights Act as a presidential achievement

Your words, not mine.

[oskar]

I'm honestly not sure where the bolded part is coming from

An immigrant detained at teh border has to be held somewhere. We are currently running out of space. Current immigration policy has them identified, given a hearing date (that they skip), and allowed to roam free in America until they are apprehended again. That's the current legal process.

Instead of letting them go, or keeping them in a detention facility, Trump is proposing to offer them a bus ride to Oakland. What's your beef with that?

I don't really have a beef with that. That's the thing. I feel utterly non-triggered by that suggestion, but it seems like a far left-ish proposal. How that would trigger dems is what I don't get. Trump has said on many occasions he wants to get rid of immigration judges. The proposal we're talking about would skip immigration court and put them straight on american mainland... just not in border cities. It's open borders a bus ride removed.

[TheSpoonald]

I don't really have a beef with that. That's the thing. I feel utterly non-triggered by that suggestion

That makes you unusual among lefties.

but it seems like a far left-ish proposal.

You're adding elements to it that aren't there. It's just our current immigration policy, as-is, plus a bus ride. Nothing is being "proposed" except the bus ride. That's why it's such a great troll....there's NOTHING to object to, unless immigrants are undesirable.

How that would trigger dems is what I don't get. Trump has said on many occasions he wants to get rid of immigration judges.

That doesn't sound right. I'd ask for a citation, but I don't care that much. It's not relevant to this anyway. No one is trying to change the number of judges right now.

The proposal we're talking about would skip immigration court

No. The proposal that you imagined would skip immigration court. Again...follow me now....everything stays the same, except we add the bus ride. Got that? The bus ride is new, everything else stays the same for now.